How do the images stack up in real world tests? Want an image that makes the sky look paradise blue? Or a selfie that makes your skin look like putty? That’s fine, but Apple’s approach to such things is direct: do it in post-production, we’ll capture all those hard-earned wrinkles first. Apple has said that it wants to give iPhone users a more true-to-life depiction of the things, people, and places being photographed, rather than an unnaturally brightened, oversaturated, or smoothed-out image. It’s ironic, really, that a company known for its secrecy, clever marketing terms, and at one point in time, its “reality distortion field” has focused squarely (or cinematically, or panoramically) on a key theme when it comes to its phone photos: truth.

But Apple says that it’s the company’s decisions around this camera technology and the sum of the parts, not the parts themselves, that sets their new cameras apart. In the past year we’ve seen great strides from major competitors such as Samsung and LG, both of which have released smartphones with highly capable cameras. Other smartphone makers could launch cameras like these - in fact, some have better technical specs. In other words: Apple’s smartphone cameras are not technically unachievable. Given Apple’s dominance in this space, it’s easy to overlook the fact that the cameras in the new iPhone 6S models are as much about Apple’s internal philosophy as they are about technical prowess and manufacturing partners. The oft-repeated cliché that the best camera is the one in your pocket wasn’t true yet, because in many ways, the best cameras were still the ones we slung around our necks.

With smartphone makers offering increasingly advanced cameras to consumers, it’s almost easy to forget that when Apple first launched the iPhone eight years ago, the original smartphone’s 2-megapixel camera was basically … functional. These aren’t just fancy terms used by Apple to market its new cameras - though, they are that, too.

Android phone with best camera 2015